richintelligentapplications

The first Tech4Africa Conference held at The Forum in Bryanston last week proved to be a refreshing and vital addition to the conference circuit.

With several high profile international speakers mixing it up with the best of breed locally, it was always going to prove an interesting and jampacked two days of talk around the challenges and opportunities on the continent.

Some highlights included the lively discussion around social media (or “the social web” as listed in the itinerary); the hilarious QA session with, amongst others John Resig (jQuery creator) and Dustin Diaz , UI goto guy for Twitter; the shared insights around mobile content for the continent; and of course, Clay Shirky’s keynote on how, beyond “lolcats”, the power of technology can enable collective action .

Here then some key takeouts for me from the two days

1.    People first

It’s never been more important to have a genuine, honest and transparent relationship with your customers (a lengthy discussion of case studies BP and the new Cell C campaign proved how high the stakes are) while the importance of community and content with value was reiterated by panel and audience. On the business side, the necessity of a healthy network popped up in more than one discussion. Your competitors and industry peers should be one of your greatest soundboards.

2.    Start small

A classic Clay Shirky delivery hit home when he advised to keep it small but good, rather than large and mediocre. It will always be more difficult to turn around and try to fix things than it is to make something of excellence, on a small scale, and grow it incrementally.

3.    Use the Cloud

It’s daunting for any growing business to be lean and efficient with resources and infrastructure. The cloud (or “the web” , as one audience member insisted) has brought numerous tools to our doorstep, enabling the almost instantaneous access to virtual servers, disk space (Dropbox), eMailing campaigns (MailChimp), project planning (Bootcamp) , without having to invest in anything but nominal subscription fees.

4.    Bad product won’t sell

Maybe an obvious one at first, but a crappy product won’t have legs. Especially in an age where a community of consumers can just as quickly shoot it down as they can build you up. Any good product has good marketing built in. Apple’s polite decline to officially engage in the social media sphere proves the point. They don’t need to get involved, because their consumers are already doing the marketing job for them.

5.    True Love

Corny right? Yet it remains that key ingredient. The one that’ll see you through the good and bad times. Without genuine care for whatever it is you’re putting out there; there is no momentum, there is no meaning, and ultimately, there is no reason for anybody else to love it either.

6.    Low fi

I’ve always believed that through limitations one excels. It’s the age old “invention through necessity” rule; and Fritz Ekwoge is proving it. His simple and brutally effective SMS “app store” and business directory (iYam) is getting a lot of attention. Bright Simons’ mPedigree is literally saving lives by enabling people in Ghana to verify the expiry date and authenticity of their medicine by SMS’ing the barcode (buying medicine over the counter in this country implies the shocking statistical likelihood of 1 out of three chances of dying from the very goods supposed to cure you). It also benefits the pharmaceuticals by returning analytics on where and how their products are sold in the continent . One wonders when everybody else are going to start using technologies such as IVR or USSD to it’s fullest potential; and yes, you may get creative with it if you’re so inclined…

7.    …but what does it do?

This may be a harsh reminder for anyone who ever slaved away on building a technical solution, but to the customer, the most important thing is whether your service or product is making his life a little easier; not which technology was used in creating it. Over-engineering may be a good thing in the civil construction business, but consumer tech should always be dead simple. If it works, why complicate it?

————————————————————————–

All in all it was a very important and extremely useful two days and I’d like to thank Gareth Knight from Technovated for firstly putting a conference of such stature together, and secondly giving me the opportunity to attend (I owe you one!)

From the online ramblings around content , content ownership and publishing to the prevalence of transmedia as a media buzzword, here then a follow up on a previous post on the subject matter . It’s maybe true that each of these need a separate discussion, but I feel that they are closely related in that everybody is looking for some perspective and definition to online / digital content - whichever direction you’re coming from.

So…here’s maybe some thoughts / outtakes / outrageous statements:

#1 Advertising and Social Media don’t mix.
Should we rather say - traditional ad placement doesn’t sit well within the social network space. Besides interruptive advertising already taking blows from all sides, one would always need effective media placement to activate. One thing is certain - people don’t like your opinion in their personal space (the reason why mobile advertising is such a tricky field). Social networks operate on connections, and users respond to content that reflect both their individuality and collective human experiences, not blatant brand messaging.

#2 Viral video is a myth. You can’t bank on it as an marketer.
Again - the critique here is against the marketer that says : “Let’s create a viral video and send it out into the world.” That’s just not how it happens (well, in most cases). In my opinion, pay attention to your community and what they are saying, let them tell you what they’d like to see/read/hear/do, and then get creative.

Story…story… story (and more particularly - a human story)… creates viral.
Think Susan Boyle. Think baby Charlie…

#3 UGC is overrated.
Well, more a mystery in it’s current fruition (vague enough?). How many marketers have honestly asked themselves what the true definition is of UGC? Is it really as simple as a gallery of users’ photos? A true UGC engagement is a community expressing themselves as a collective and enjoying one another’s understanding of that cultural unifier. As a marketer, your extracted value lies in exactly that.

#4 Advertisers don’t know how to create content…
In many ways the formulas and methodologies of modern marketing has stifled us in relating the human experience. One can get nostalgic and reminisce about the good old days when TV ads were the source ofa collective laugh around the dinner table (dinner table?) - a moment shared (and at best they still are). Why is this so rarely translated onto our device screens? Did we allow the combination of marketing academia and our obsession with tech kill the human connection? We need to reclaim and re-recognise the human moment… For this reason,  marketers need to be in business with content creators (read storytellers, particularly good writers who understand a multi-channel world) to produce the right material, but also partner up with the publisher to ensure that there is reach.

Collaboration is needed to actualise these endeavours. Content creation can be an expensive excersise.
Ideally, it should be easy to build and easy to get initial traction.

#5 Content doesn’t imply the latest news
If there is one recurring phrase that irrates, it is “latest news”. Honestly - what value does that give to anybody coming to your website / portal / project page? People buy newspapers not to read the latest news, but they associate themselves with that publication for their particular brand of comment and analysis around events of the day or week, it’s cultural slants, crossword puzzles etc. It’s the peripheral (and personal) that give things unique value.

#6 Social networks are content distribution networks.
Maybe not a new one but an important one to state again. The power of spreading the word about your content through social networks can’t be overstated. But your content would still need a channel, or multiple channels to call a home. Having your content live on multiple channels doesn’t mean the same content on different platforms. Uploading your TVC to youtube doesn’t exactly give your users choice or added value, it just clutters the landscape. Build appropriate and paralell definitions that compliment each other… it’s called media modality - where content sits comfortably within it’s skin.

So what does constitute a valid vehicle to get your content out there? A desktop app? A mobisite? A podcast? Where does you content live? Where your users are, of course! And that, will always be the big question…

#7 Insight cannot be measured
There is that nagging, but valid, obsession with measurement. We all want to see those conversion figures go up , up ,up. We also want to hone our tactics through monitoring what works and what doesn’t. But isn’t the more valuable outtake of any interaction with your brand the evidence of genuine engagement and relevance of the brand within the experience. Engagement is not a measurable currency, and the true outtake of engagement is insight.

In closing…
The renewed focus on content from the marketing industry is not surprising. Within a sea of information and media being consumed (let’s be honest, most of it really bad), and desensitised consumers getting tired of “the sell”,  it’s forcing brands to look at what unique value they are providing their customers, how they are building relationships without paying lip service, and how the message can come through without talking about themselves.

Some reading:

- Putting your content where it matters

- Rupert Murdoch on the future of journalism

- Four tips for Brands embracing new methods of storytelling

- Why we should kill “Socila Media”

- The Future of the Story

A very handy summary of the Razorfish 2009 report on the digital consumer, done by Guy Kawasaki:

At the start of 2009 I read a book called “Communities Dominate Brands” (a few years old, but all still very relevant), with several insights into emerging trends in digital consumption, in particular emphasis on mobile . But one that really stuck amongst all the predictions and trend forecasts was the statement that content will become key, and that whoever is best at partnering in providing these content offerings will win.

Since then I’ve seen numerous parallels between this statement and what is happening in the traditional print/publication industry, in particular the rapid re-definition of the good old newspaper. Out of pure necessity for survival, the newspaper as modern publication has had to become creative in it’s offering, with the healthiest ones embracing digital media as a valid and powerfull delivery channel. If you look at what NY Times is now proudly showcasing as part of their digital services, together with the prolifiration of online video, it’s becoming a really interestig space to look at as a digital marketer.

Film makers too are embracing a new and viable distribution channel for independent productions, with a recent UK located conference, Power to the Pixel focusing on how cross medium selling could enable the storyteller. The idea of letting a story (read concept/big idea in marketing speak) live on various platforms is also an exciting and liberating notion.

One particular presentation / discussion from the ad:tech Chicago 2008 conference (download PART I , and PART II here), called “The Consumer Experience in a Multi-Platform World” also spoke to this point. A good example was TV series enhancements in the form of parallel storylines or subplots that are hinted or alluded to in the TV series, and that are viewable on the web, providing added value in bonus viewing material to the viewer, effectively pushing viewership from on air to online (CSI Miami / GM Hummer, CBS Interactive) .

There is currently, I believe, a HUGE gap in the conceptualisation, production and syndication of these content driven experiences and, if I may modify / re-appropriate the initial statement that started all this off, it is here where anyone with a sense of narrative and appreciation for the power of a story, together with a grasp of the new and complex media landscape, would be able to enjoy the opportunities out there.

Mycelial Networks

Mycelial Networks

I’ve always been interested in the concept of using microbial / biological organisms to create information systems. A while ago , I posted  a link to an article by New Scientist about some fascinating research in this regard, including DNA.

Today - I stumbled upon  a TED presentation by Paul Stamets, about mycillium ( mushrooms) , and it’s amazing uses . He went on to explain how they already provide us with anti-biotics, and have proven to break down oil spills, are creating an alternative to those nasty insecticides, biofuel and more; but to me,  and the most surprising of all to find out was that fungi are capable of creating a massive neural network, and are scentient of you.

Mushrooms are truly amazing things. And we would be foolish to not look at how we could “partner up” with these complex and acnient organisms to create a better future…

Listed  in the following wired article, another brand / band / muso has decided to use augmented reality in their marketing drive.. this time it’s Blink 182..

While we’re at it .. here’s the first known ( slightly dated by online timeline standard) local application of AR :

Finally , for good measure , here a list of recent applications on the marketing front.

By this time you’ve gotta ask.. who’s next … ?

Visual Complexity
Visual Complexity

-

So - another post on the amazing efforts by some talented folk in representing data in an engaging and logical way. To quote the About section on VisualComplexity.com: “VisualComplexity.com intends to be a unified resource space for anyone interested in the visualization of complex networks. “I won;t pretend to understand the underlying algorithms that go into creating this imagery, but it sure looks pretty. What I do miss in all these examples is the narrative; the story. If we are to represent data in a humane and digestible manner , shouldn’t it be removed from the abstract, and made tangible and transformed into a human experience? Most of it is still abstract pieces of art to me… where’s the deeper analogy/alegory… ?

Still , beautiful…

Opera 10 : Your own Youtube?

Seems that Opera 10 is taking on the big guns ( Flickr, Youtube amongst others) by skipping the middle man when it comes to file sharing, and allowing you to be your own datacloud.  This according to another great article by FastCompany

It called Opra Unite , and it’s simple ( and frankly nothing new - just think Napster)  - instead of uploading your content to the servers of Youtube, Flickr etc, you use your own hardrive as server and simply allow people to paruse and download whichever filed you allow them to.

Here’s Opera’s explanation of the concept ( strange little video may I add):

Very interesting permutation of a “gestures”  interface. Simply wear it around your neck and project onto any surface for instant ui gratification. Oh - and your cellphone provides your connectivity and computation…

A while back I posted video here , featuring the guys from Boffswana playing around with Flash 3D engines and a webcam, enabling interaction  with 3D objects in your world. It’s called Augmented Reality , and it’s a fast growing field. Eminem is the latest to utilise the technology, enabling his fans to graffiti on a 3D “E” that you can place on yuor desk, rotate and decorate.

Eminem Augmented Reality Screencast from Outside Line on Vimeo.